By Helena Cobban
From The Christian Science Monitor, May 8, 2003
BELAVISTA, MOZAMBIQUE
- After the guns of war fall silent, what happens to the people whose
main role during the war was to be professional fighters? This is an important
challenge for US communities as they welcome back soldiers previously deployed
in Iraq.
I came
to this small town in southern Mozambique to discuss this with a group of
men brought together by an organization of people who had fought - on both
sides - in the civil war that ravaged this sprawling, ocean-side country
from 1976 through 1992.
We perched
on a circle of chairs set outside the local office of a human rights group.
Participants included two rights activists, four men who had fought in
the civil war, and a traditional healer. They all stressed that communities
need to take special steps to reintegrate community members who return home
after participation in, or close exposure to, a war.
Jorge
Moine, the healer, explained that when a community member returns from war,
his or her parents would traditionally sit by a holy tree, and ask the
family's ancestors for guidance on reintegrating the returning one. Then
there would be special ceremonies to "cleanse" the former fighter of the
taint of war before he would be allowed back into the home.
"Some
people might do traditional ceremonies. Others might go to a church and
say a special mass for this purpose," he said. But one way or another, the
transition from wartime behavior to peacetime behavior should be meaningfully
marked.
During
Mozambique's war, around a million of this impoverished country's 16 million
citizens were killed, 5 million were displaced, and numerous shocking
atrocities were committed. Despite that violence and upheaval, once the
government and the insurgent Mozambique National Resistance (RENAMO) concluded
a peace agreement in October 1992, the country rapidly returned to peace.
And the peace has proven robust ever since.
How did
Mozambique achieve this? Even throughout the civil war, it retained many
strong cultural resources for peacemaking and conflict resolution. The
ancient traditions of the 16 or so different language groups were one such
resource - as were many of its Christian churches.
Churches
played an important role throughout the process of making and then consolidating
the peace. The first contacts between the government and RENAMO leaders
were brokered by local Christian leaders, and the 17 months of negotiations
were hosted - in Rome - by a Catholic lay organization, Sant'Egidio. During
negotiations, numerous members of the clergy and traditional healers worked
in their different ways to prepare the population for the transition to
peace.
How did
these community leaders help individual Mozambicans deal with the sense
of hurt that arose from the atrocities committed during the war? In other
countries, such acts would likely have led to calls for revenge - or at
least for post-war punishment. In Mozambique, most community leaders met
the desire for retribution by explaining that the heinous acts had been
committed in the extraordinary circumstances of war, but that with peace,
the rules that govern "normal," peaceful life would come back into operation.
Wartime atrocities were thus attributed much more to the social breakdown
of war itself, rather than to intentional acts undertaken by specific individuals.
I asked
the group here if they thought people who'd committed bad acts during the
war should be punished.
"If you
did that, the whole of Mozambique should have been punished!" one combat
veteran replied.
"War
is war," another explained. "Everything that happens in war is violent.
You can't pick out certain parts of it as worse than the rest."
I found
such views expressed by nearly all the people I talked to during two weeks
of intensive discussions of this issue. Only one or two of the 30 or so
Mozambicans I heard from expressed any concern that the general amnesty
for war-era atrocities included in the 1992 peace agreement may have fostered
a climate of "impunity" for former perpetrators.
Many
Western rights activists believe that when wars end, all atrocities committed
during them should be prosecuted in war-crimes courts. But these activists
should pay attention to the fact that in Mozambique in 1992 - as in South
Africa - it was only an offer of amnesty for former atrocities that allowed
a period of conflict and gross rights-abuse to end.
Another
lesson Westerners might take from Mozambique is the care people here take
to reintegrate former combatants into normal society once the war has ended.
The US "discovered" posttraumatic stress disorder in the 1970s. But Mozambique's
indigenous leaders have been paying special attention for centuries to the
sensitive transition individuals have to make when they exit the war zone
and return to peaceful society.
That
transition, Mozambicans believe, requires not only the rituals that mark
it clearly, but also solid help in connecting former soldiers to productive
work and normal family life.
The programs
designed to help this happen were far from perfect. But still, 92,000 former
combatants from both sides were demobilized - and the peace agreement has
sunk remarkably strong roots in the past 10 years.
People
who want to see how societies can escape endless cycles of violence can
learn a lot by studying Mozambique: an African country that has done just
that.